The moon landing: if they weren't made-up why hasn't any country gone put money on to the moon using matching equipment?
What I mean by that is we in a minute have engineers, scientists, etc telling us they are trying to develop a technology to carry a manned craft there - the technology supposedly exists or did surrounded by the 60's.
So do you think the landings be faked?
I'm curious.
Answers:
they are not trying to develop technology to get within rather reusable technology to get at hand...and farther
The landings were actual
It was not fake, billions watch on television..or is tv fake too? They brought pay for moon rock and that is not a substance on earth.
ana
I believe it be fake. With the technology, like you stated, we should be getting here with NO problems.
Houston we have a problem. What!?!!??!?!?
Better equipment; and we also own the better equipment to catch the trap. A lot of that was not available to us so we could not counteract their stories.
No, the moon landing was real, a moment ago scientists today now wants to travel to the moon with no problems because in the 60's space ships be to low tech and had many problems going to the moon.
we don't have the planes for the stuff back next.
they were made-up. duh.
I can understand why individuals believe that man has been on the moon. They are told by a radio or a box. Which to me are propaganda machines controlled by the government. The public did not witness it however. If you have suspicions that it could not have been possible back after or even possible today, then you should always listen to your brain to some extent than what other people say.
I intuitively believe that they didn't land on the moon for two reasons. The first is that in attendance is a belt of matter between the Earth and our Moon. The second reason is that they would of melt themselves and their equipment due to an extreme lack of atmosphere.
Did you know that if the Earth was the size of an apple, the moon would be over 1 metre away. Try Visualising them going adjectives that way in the SIXTIES guided by funny weak fashion computers with silly flashy lights and it be no near as good as the computer you're using presently.
That's why they never went back. Because they never go!
But don't listen to me. You have to think for yourself and see what they had and didn't have within the sixties.
I cbelieve the moon landing is fake because there is no nouns on the moon and the flag was moving like it have air on the moon. it doesnt seem tangible its all a fake surrounded by my book
Money,
No one would settle for it now, there are too tons wars to fund
Good point, but I suppose it was really heroic and precarious looking back in perception, and it was really expensive - Vietnam put a bit of a dampener on things.
The landing were not faked. They be very real, but I doubt anyone would lug the risk of using the same technology of the 60's to get within.
However, there are some rumors that NASA and the ESA (European Space Agency) are planning missions to the Moon, and one of Mars moons. No official word from them nonetheless, unfortunatelly.
I just wonder if it is worth to be sending people to Mars, when the pathfinder missions already proved that there's no vivacity in Mars, and that the best options are contained by its moons.
They were real. The purpose we dont go there very soon is simply because there is no reason to travel back. The USA only go there in the first place to show the Soviet Union.
The equipment was either used up or it get old and useless. We're basically redeveloping aged tech because we let it rot on the vine through non use.
The Moonlandings did happen. Thats a certainty. Visit badastronomy.com for all the details.
Gas is too expensive and it's a long, dull trip beside not much scenery. Not even cows. And nothing to do when you find there. No amusement parks, no McDonalds, not even a Sonic.
They were physical ... they know we can't live there and there are no resources to pick ... going back again and again would be hugely expensive and have no financial benefit and at hand is no longer a "we did it first" title to claim ... they are putting that money to space shuttle experiments, etc. ...
Related Questions:
Can we use park procession phone to control houshold electrical equipments. Is the techonology available?
I am working for a company, but enjoy to use my own equipment i.e. computer, software, bench can I claim money?
I freshly started taking GNC's Mass XXX... what are some suitable stomach exercises in need using machines/equipment?
What close to different pitching equipment things andworkouts you can use for them to aid you seize your speed up?
Is in that anyway to use Action Replay codes lacking extra equipment(only a slim ps2, mem card, and controller)?
So do you think the landings be faked?
I'm curious.
Answers:
they are not trying to develop technology to get within rather reusable technology to get at hand...and farther
The landings were actual
It was not fake, billions watch on television..or is tv fake too? They brought pay for moon rock and that is not a substance on earth.
ana
I believe it be fake. With the technology, like you stated, we should be getting here with NO problems.
Houston we have a problem. What!?!!??!?!?
Better equipment; and we also own the better equipment to catch the trap. A lot of that was not available to us so we could not counteract their stories.
No, the moon landing was real, a moment ago scientists today now wants to travel to the moon with no problems because in the 60's space ships be to low tech and had many problems going to the moon.
we don't have the planes for the stuff back next.
they were made-up. duh.
I can understand why individuals believe that man has been on the moon. They are told by a radio or a box. Which to me are propaganda machines controlled by the government. The public did not witness it however. If you have suspicions that it could not have been possible back after or even possible today, then you should always listen to your brain to some extent than what other people say.
I intuitively believe that they didn't land on the moon for two reasons. The first is that in attendance is a belt of matter between the Earth and our Moon. The second reason is that they would of melt themselves and their equipment due to an extreme lack of atmosphere.
Did you know that if the Earth was the size of an apple, the moon would be over 1 metre away. Try Visualising them going adjectives that way in the SIXTIES guided by funny weak fashion computers with silly flashy lights and it be no near as good as the computer you're using presently.
That's why they never went back. Because they never go!
But don't listen to me. You have to think for yourself and see what they had and didn't have within the sixties.
I cbelieve the moon landing is fake because there is no nouns on the moon and the flag was moving like it have air on the moon. it doesnt seem tangible its all a fake surrounded by my book
Money,
No one would settle for it now, there are too tons wars to fund
Good point, but I suppose it was really heroic and precarious looking back in perception, and it was really expensive - Vietnam put a bit of a dampener on things.
The landing were not faked. They be very real, but I doubt anyone would lug the risk of using the same technology of the 60's to get within.
However, there are some rumors that NASA and the ESA (European Space Agency) are planning missions to the Moon, and one of Mars moons. No official word from them nonetheless, unfortunatelly.
I just wonder if it is worth to be sending people to Mars, when the pathfinder missions already proved that there's no vivacity in Mars, and that the best options are contained by its moons.
They were real. The purpose we dont go there very soon is simply because there is no reason to travel back. The USA only go there in the first place to show the Soviet Union.
The equipment was either used up or it get old and useless. We're basically redeveloping aged tech because we let it rot on the vine through non use.
The Moonlandings did happen. Thats a certainty. Visit badastronomy.com for all the details.
Gas is too expensive and it's a long, dull trip beside not much scenery. Not even cows. And nothing to do when you find there. No amusement parks, no McDonalds, not even a Sonic.
They were physical ... they know we can't live there and there are no resources to pick ... going back again and again would be hugely expensive and have no financial benefit and at hand is no longer a "we did it first" title to claim ... they are putting that money to space shuttle experiments, etc. ...
Related Questions: